“Real impact”: Challenges and opportunities in bridging the gap between research and practice – Making a difference in industry, policy, and society

Authors

Yogesh K. Dwivedi, School of Management
Anand Jeyaraj, Wright State University - Main Campus
Laurie Hughes, Edith Cowan University
Gareth H. Davies, School of Management
Manju Ahuja, University of Louisville
Mousa Ahmed Albashrawi, KFUPM Business School
Adil S. Al-Busaidi, Sultan Qaboos University
Salah Al-Sharhan, International University of Science and Technology in Kuwait (IUK)
Khalid Ibrahim Al-Sulaiti, Al-Rayyan International University College
Levent Altinay, Oxford Brookes Business School
Shem Amalaya, KPMG
Sunil Archak, ICAR-National Bureau of Plant Genetic Resources
María Teresa Ballestar, Universidad Rey Juan Carlos
Shonil A. Bhagwat, The Open University
Anandhi Bharadwaj, Goizueta Business School
Amit Bhushan, Bank Muscat SAOG
Indranil Bose, Indian Institute of Management Ahmedabad
Pawan Budhwar, Aston Business School
Deborah Bunker, Natural Hazards Research Australia
Alexandru Capatina, “Dunarea de Jos” University of Galati
Lemuria Carter, The University of Sydney Business School
Ioanna Constantiou, Copenhagen Business School
Crispin Coombs, Loughborough University, School of Business and Economics
Tom Crick, Swansea University
Csaba Csáki, Corvinus University of Budapest
Yves Darnige, Data & Artificial Intelligence Practice Director
Rahul Dé, Indian Institute of Management Bangalore
Rick Delbridge, Cardiff Business School
Rameshwar Dubey, Montpellier Business School
Robin Gauld, University of Otago
Ravi Kumar Gutti, University of Hyderabad
Marié Hattingh, University of Pretoria

Document Type

Editorial

Publication Date

10-1-2024

Identifier/URL

41032500 (Pure)

Abstract

Achieving impact from academic research is a challenging, complex, multifaceted, and interconnected topic with a number of competing priorities and key performance indicators driving the extent and reach of meaningful and measurable benefits from research. Academic researchers are incentivized to publish their research in high-ranking journals and academic conferences but also to demonstrate the impact of their outputs through metrics such as citation counts, altmetrics, policy and practice impacts, and demonstrable institutional decision-making influence. However, academic research has been criticized for: its theoretical emphasis, high degree of complexity, jargon-heavy language, disconnect from industry and societal needs, overly complex and lengthy publishing timeframe, and misalignment between academic and industry objectives. Initiatives such as collaborative research projects and technology transfer offices have attempted to deliver meaningful impact, but significant barriers remain in the identification and evaluation of tangible impact from academic research. This editorial focusses on these aspects to deliver a multi-expert perspective on impact by developing an agenda to deliver more meaningful and demonstrable change to how “impact” can be conceptualized and measured to better align with the aims of academia, industry, and wider society. We present the 4D model - Design, Deliver, Disseminate, and Demonstrate - to provide a structured approach for academia to better align research endeavors with practice and deliver meaningful, tangible benefits to stakeholders.

Comments

Publisher Copyright: © 2024 Elsevier Ltd

DOI

10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2023.102750

Find in your library

Off-Campus WSU Users


Share

COinS