Document Type

Article

Publication Date

5-7-2019

City

Dayton

Abstract

For decades, aviation has been at the leading edge of safety and human factors data collection. These data have provided valuable insights into emerging trends and human-system performance needs. As industry continues to improve its data collection capabilities, stakeholders must develop a common understanding and use of safety performance monitoring (SPM) practices and terms governed by ICAO (ICAO Annex 19, ICAO Doc 9859). SPM is a critical component of Safety Management Systems and State Safety Programs. To understand industry’s awareness and use of SPM in current operations, an SPM Survey was administered. Responses were received from 161 domain representatives in six ICAO global regions. Response data revealed the current state of industry SPM practices, SPM variability across domains and regions, and generalizable best practices. This paper will present top safety performance targets (SPTs), safety data analysis methods, and safety data sources utilized by respondents to track, analyze, and measure risk across five areas: Maintenance (n=120), Near Mid-Air Collision (n=95), Runway Safety (n=124), Loss of Control-Inflight (n=92), Controlled Flight into Terrain (n=109). Survey data revealed that the top SPTs set by respondents are: Unstable approaches (83.5%), Runway Excursions (70.1%). The top analysis methods used are: Causal Factor Analysis (68.1%), FDM/FOQA Software (59.7). The top data sources are: Voluntary Reports (93.8%), Mandatory Reports (86.2%). This paper will describe how SPM survey results may be used to develop a supplemental Safety Performance Monitoring Handbook in 2019, which will be intended to drive an industry-wide shift towards proactive and predictive safety risk management.

Download


Share

COinS