Dayton Liederkranz-Turner Correspondence

Follow

• 

  Letter, R. W. Lynch to Fred Olt

  R. W. Lynch

  This letter was written to a brewery following the news that the imminent return of legal sales of alcohol. It was a letter written in application of a position at the company, as they saw an opportunity with the immanent sales increasing demand. It lists their various qualifications, previous employers, and other information they deemed pertinent. It closes out with some discussion of salary.

• 

  Letter, H. H. McClellan to Fred Olt

  H. H. McClellan

  This letter was written to Fred Olt, of Olt Brewing Company. It was written in regards to a perceived need for additional office support as beer production would expand. This letter was written to recommend Mary Kathryn Pohl for such a position, and commends her character as a potential employee.

• 

  Letter, H. T. McDermott to Fred Olt

  H. T. McDermott

  This letter was written in response to Fred Olt's initial letter about any publications serving the brewing industry. It begins by listing the publications initially asked for, the continues on providing additional information in regards to an additional publication that they might find informative, information on two brewing academies, and to indicate they also have information in another industry that Fred's letter head made reference to.

• 

  Letter, Frank Olt to The Wahl-Henius Institute

  Fred Olt

  This is a letter written by Fred Olt to request information on local brewing publications. The back has handwritten notes on it.

• 

  Letter, Wahl-Henius Institute to Fred Olt

  Wahl-Henius Institute

  This letter was written in response to Fred Olt's initial letter about any publications serving the brewing industry. It lists 4 different publications that might be of interest.

• 

  Letter, 1919, April 29, Baltimore Process Company to Breweries

  Baltimore Process Company

  This letter was written from the Baltimore Process Company in hopes to clarify much of the confusion surrounding the initial rulings during prohibition. It stated what companies had to do in order to continue manufacturing alcohol, and some common misconceptions that surrounded their continued manufacture.

• 

  Letter, 1919, May 19, Baltimore Process Company to Breweries

  Baltimore Process Company

  This letter was written from the Baltimore Process Company after a decision handed down by a Federal Court in New York City in regards to beer manufacture. It outlines that while intoxicating beer has been banned, that near beer has not. It also states that a upcoming decision will outline what constitutes near vs intoxicating beer. This letter also outlines the tax on near beer, when it is imposed, and how.

• 

  Letter, Hemrich's Staff Products Company to Alt Brothers Brewing Company

  Hemrich's Staff Products Company

  This letter was written to the Alt Brothers Brewing Company to sell the process for a non-alcoholic near beer. This is in response to much of the state restricting the sale of beverages with more than 1/2% to 1% alcohol content. It thanks the company for allowing them to send samples of some of their product, lists other clients, and pitches a process that will not require many adjustments from their current setup, or require additional training.

• 

  Letter, W. A. Steinemann to Olt Brothers Brewing Company

  W. A. Steinemann

  This letter was written to pitch new near-beer beverage. The letter was meant to anyone who manufactures similar products already to entice these manufacturers to create this new beverage. It touts the many strengths of this product, and how it may be transitioned into a light alcoholic beverage once the laws permit their creation.

• 

  Letter, The Frank Fehr Process Company to Olt Brewing Company

  The Frank Fehr Process Company

  This letter was written to sell manufacturers a new process to create a "near beer" that complied with the laws of Ohio during prohibition. The letter goes into some detail of the benefits of the process, without giving too much away. It also offers an opportunity to taste the product at a nearby facility so that manufacturers are not buying the process without testing it first.