Publication Date

2022

Document Type

Dissertation

Committee Members

Nathan A. Bowling, Ph.D. (Advisor); David M. LaHuis, Ph.D. (Committee Member); Corey E. Miller, Ph.D. (Committee Member); Brian D. Lyons, Ph.D. (Committee Member)

Degree Name

Doctor of Philosophy (PhD)

Abstract

Perpetrator workplace aggression has always been considered as a uni-dimensional construct from the uni-dimensional perspective. The most popular and widely used scale, interpersonal deviance scale (IDS; Bennett & Robinson, 2000), to assess perpetrator workplace aggression has only seven items (i.e., seven content areas), which lacks a high level of content-related and construct-related validity. Recently, researchers have suggested that perpetrator workplace aggression may be a construct with a general factor at the top (Sackett & DeVore, 2001); however, this general factor can be less clear for a more complex model (Marcus et al., 2016). Using three samples (N = 271, 337, & 264), this research found that perpetrator workplace aggression was also a uni-dimensional construct from the multi-dimensional perspective, the general factor was very clear for a complex model, and developed a new scale with a higher level of content-related (i.e., 24 different content areas of perpetrator workplace aggression) and construct-related validity (by developing a large nomological network). In addition to a higher level of content-related and construct-related validity, the new scale showed a higher level of internal consistency and substantive validity. Hence, I recommend that researchers and practitioners use this new scale in future when assessing perpetrator workplace aggression.

Page Count

142

Department or Program

Department of Psychology

Year Degree Awarded

2022

Creative Commons License

Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial-Share Alike 3.0 License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial-Share Alike 3.0 License.

ORCID ID

0000-0002-9977-7826


Share

COinS