Validating Self-Reported Critical Incidents Using a Cognitive Screening Test for GA Pilots

Authors

Emily Larkin, Carleton University
Kathleen Van Benthem, Carleton University
Alexia Bierlaire, Carleton University
Rawan Othman, Carleton University
Chris M. Herdman, Carleton University

Document Type

Article

Publication Date

2025

Abstract

The lack of standardized cognitive testing for general aviation (GA) pilots maycontribute to alarming rates of fatal accidents in GA, putting GA pilots at seriousrisk. This research aims to develop the CANFLY to assess and predict risk inpilots. Given its online delivery and reliance on self-reports, validating the tool isessential. Forty-three licensed pilots ages 18-75 (M = 19.44, SD = 15.83) engagedwith pre-recorded flight segments, and answered cognitive health questions.Situational awareness related to reports of critical incidents, while marginallysignificant relationships between task management and most recent checkridewere found. Initial results show some support for the CANFLY’s ability to reflectrisk. Final results will benefit the GA community and inform policies andpractices for keeping pilots flying for as long as safely possible.

Comments

Presented at the 23rd International Symposium on Aviation Psychology, May 27-30, 2025, Hosted by Oregon State University

Repository Citation

Larkin, E., Van Benthem, K., Bierlaire, A., Othman, R., & Herdman, C. M. (2025). Validating Self-Reported Critical Incidents Using a Cognitive Screening Test for GA Pilots. Proceedings of the 23rd International Symposium on Aviation Psychology, 138-143.
https://corescholar.libraries.wright.edu/isap_2025/24