Changing the Algorithm in the Evaluation of Pelvic Anatomy in the Infertile Patient: Is Hysterosalpingo Contrast Sonography With Saline-Air Device the Appropriate Test for Everyone?

Authors

Kathryn Coyne
Thomas C. Winter
Rose Maxwell, Wright State UniversityFollow
Steven Lindheim, Wright State UniversityFollow

Document Type

Article

Publication Date

4-25-2016

Abstract

The evaluation of the fallopian tubes is an essential part of the infertility workup, with abnormalities related to the fallopian tubes accounting for up to 40% of female subfertility.1 Laparoscopy is still considered the gold standard in the diagnostic evaluation of fallopian tubes, though the hysterosalpingogram (HSG) has long been recognized as complementary to laparoscopy, since tubal anatomy can be distinctly be seen.2 That said, previous investigations using laparoscopy as the gold standard demonstrate HSG has a sensitivity and specificity of 53% and 87%, respectively, for any tubal pathology and 46% and 95%, respectively, for bilateral tubal pathology.3

Comments

©2016 Lindheim SR. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (CC BY 4.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Repository Citation

Coyne, K., Winter, T. C., Maxwell, R., & Lindheim, S. (2016). Changing the Algorithm in the Evaluation of Pelvic Anatomy in the Infertile Patient: Is Hysterosalpingo Contrast Sonography With Saline-Air Device the Appropriate Test for Everyone?. Gynecology and Obstetrics Research, 2 (5), 1000GOROJ2126.
https://corescholar.libraries.wright.edu/obgyn/17

DOI

10.17140/GOROJ-2-126