Document Type
Article
Publication Date
11-15-2024
Identifier/URL
41658952 (Pure); 39392724 (PubMed); PMC11576233 (PubMedCentral)
Abstract
Patients with myotonia congenita suffer from slowed muscle relaxation caused by hyperexcitability. The diaphragm is only mildly affected in myotonia congenita; discovery of the mechanism underlying its resistance to myotonia could identify novel therapeutic targets. Intracellular recordings from two mouse models of myotonia congenita revealed the diaphragm had less myotonia than either the extensor digitorum longus (EDL) or the soleus muscles. A mechanism contributing to resistance of the diaphragm to myotonia was reduced depolarization of the interspike membrane potential during repetitive firing of action potentials, a process driven by build-up of K+ in small invaginations of muscle membrane known as t-tubules. We explored differences between diaphragm and EDL that might underlie reduction of K+ build-up in diaphragm t-tubules. Smaller size of diaphragm fibres, which promotes diffusion of K+ out of t-tubules, was identified as a contributor. Intracellular recording revealed slower repolarization of action potentials in diaphragm suggesting reduced Kv conductance. Higher resting membrane conductance was identified suggesting increased Kir conductance. Computer simulation found that a reduction of Kv conductance had little effect on K+ build-up whereas increased Kir conductance lessened build-up, although the effect was modest. Our data and computer simulation suggest opening of K+ channels during action potentials has little effect on K+ build-up whereas opening of K+ channels during the interspike interval slightly lessens K+ build-up. We conclude that activation of K+ channels may lessen myotonia by opposing depolarization to action potential threshold without worsening K+ build-up in t-tubules.
Repository Citation
Myers, J. H.,
Denman, K.,
Dupont, C.,
Foy, B. D.,
& Rich, M. M.
(2024). Reduced K+ Build-Up in T-Tubules Contributes to Resistance of the Diaphragm to Myotonia. The Journal of Physiology, 602 (22), 6171-6188.
https://corescholar.libraries.wright.edu/physics/1125
DOI
10.1113/JP286636
Comments
This work is licensed under CC BY 4.0
